《古生物学报》编辑部出版伦理指南（试行）
EthicsGuidepublishedbytheEditorial Departmentof
Acta Palaeontologica Sinica(Trial ).
为进一步加强作者、审稿专家及编辑的职业伦理素养，提升期刊出版水平，《古生物学报》编辑部参考国际出版伦理委员会(COPE)、Elsevier等相关出版伦理规范，结合期刊出版实际情况，制定《古生物学报》出版伦理指南。
1. 作者的出版伦理
1)不能将稿件同时投给多个期刊，已经发表的稿件不能重复发表。
2)保证稿件为原创作品，无抄袭、剽窃、数据伪造等学术不端行为，稿件内容不含涉密信息。
3)稿件内容表述科学、准确，文责自负。
4)所有署名作者均符合期刊关于作者资格的要求，不可随意增减作者。
5)对他人的研究成果给予客观评价，并在稿件中正确标引。
6)在稿件中写明与该研究有关的资助信息，不可写与该研究无关的其他资助信息。
7)尊重审稿专家的意见，如有异议，可以向编辑部提出申诉。
2. 审稿专家的出版伦理
1)及时评审稿件并给出具体审稿意见，如果因故不能按时完成评审，应及时告知编辑部。
2)对稿件的评价科学、准确，不能有无礼、贬低、人身攻击的评语出现。
3)尊重作者的研究成果，对稿件内容保密，并且不能违规使用作者的研究成果。
4)与作者、组织等存在竞争、合作或其他关联利益冲突时，主动回避评审该稿件。
3. 编辑的出版伦理
1)及时将稿件登记、送审、编辑出版等，保证公正地对待每一篇稿件。
2)编辑出版过程中，注重出版规范。
3)尊重作者的研究成果，对稿件内容保密，并且不能违规使用作者的研究成果。
4)尊重审稿专家的意见，如作者有异议，允许作者提出申诉。
5)鼓励学术争论，百家争鸣。
6)采用“匿名评审制度”，对审稿专家的信息保密。
7)与作者、组织等存在竞争、合作或其他关联利益冲突时，主动回避处理该稿件。
In order to further toenhance the professional ethics of authors, reviewers and editors, and improve the level of journal publishing, the Editorial Department of Acta Palaeontologica Sinica has made reference to the international Committee on Publishing Ethics (COPE ), Elsevier and other relevant publishing ethics, and combined with the actual situation of journal publishing, to develop the Ethical guidelines for the publication of Acta Palaeontology.
1. Author's publishing ethics
1) The manuscript cannot be submitted to multiple journals at the same time, and the published manuscript cannot be published repeatedly.
2) Ensure that the manuscript is original, free from plagiarism, plagiarism, data forgery and other academic misconduct, and that the content of the manuscript contains no confidential information.
3) The content of the manuscript is scientific and accurate, and the author is self-responsible.
4) All the signed authors meet the requirements of the journal on the qualifications of authors, and the authors cannot be added or subtracted at will.
5) Objectively evaluate the research results of others, and correctly quote from the manuscript.
6) The funding information related to the research shall be written in the manuscript, and other funding information unrelated to the research shall not be written in the manuscript.
7) Respect the opinions of reviewers. If you have any objection, you can appeal to the editorial department.
2. Publishing ethics of reviewers
1) Timely review the manuscript and give specific comments on the review. If the review cannot be completed on time for some reason, the editorial department should be informed timely.
2) The evaluation of the manuscript should be scientific and accurate, and there should be no offensive, belittling or personal attacks.
3) Respect the author's research results, keep the contents of the manuscript confidential, and do not use the author's research results illegally.
4) In case of competition, cooperation or other related interest conflicts with the author or the organization, the reviewer shall actively avoid reviewing the manuscript.
3. Publishing ethics of editors
1) Timely register, submit, edit and publish manuscripts to ensure fair treatment of each manuscript.
2) Pay attention to publishing standards of / for the editing and publishing process.
3) Respect the author's research results, keep the contents of the manuscript confidential, and do not use the author's research results illegally.
4) Respect the opinions of reviewers. If the author has any objection, the author is allowed to appeal.
5) Academic debate is encouraged and a hundred schools of thought contend.
6) Adopt the " anonymous review system " to keep confidential the information about/on reviewers.
7) In case of competition, cooperation or other related interest conflicts with the author or the organization, actively avoid dealing with the manuscript
《古生物学报》编辑部
Editorial Department of Acta Palaeontologica Sinica
2019. 10. 30
