《古生物学报》出版伦理规范（试行）
Publishing Ethics of
Acta Palaeontologica Sinica (Trial ).
为进一步加强作者、审稿专家及编辑的出版行业伦理素养，提升期刊出版水平，《古生物学报》编辑部结合期刊出版实际情况，制定本刊出版伦理规范如下:
1.作者出版伦理
1)不能将同一稿件同时投给多个期刊，已经发表的稿件不能重复发表。
2)保证稿件为原创作品，无抄袭、剽窃、数据伪造或篡改等学术不端行为，稿件内容不含涉密信息。
3)稿件内容表述科学、准确。
4)所有署名作者均对该研究有实质性贡献，不得随意增减作者。
5)对他人的研究成果给予客观评价，并在稿件中正确标引。
6)在稿件中写明与该研究有关的资助信息，不得写与该研究无关的其他资助信息。
7)尊重审稿专家的意见，如有异议，可以向编辑部提出申诉。
2.审稿专家出版伦理
1)及时评审稿件并给出具体审稿意见，如因故不能按时完成评审，应及时告知编辑部。
2)对稿件的评价客观、准确，不能有无礼、贬低、人身攻击的评语出现。
3)尊重作者的研究成果，对稿件内容保密，并且不能违规使用作者的研究成果。
4)与作者、组织等存在竞争、合作或其他关联利益关系时，应主动回避评审该稿件。
3.编辑出版伦理
1)及时将稿件登记、送审、编辑出版等，保证公正地对待每一篇稿件。
2)编辑出版过程中，注重出版规范。
3)尊重作者的研究成果，正式发表前对稿件内容保密，并且不能违规使用作者的研究成果。
4)尊重审稿专家的意见，如作者有异议，允许作者提出申诉。
5)鼓励学术争论，百家争鸣。
6)采用“匿名评审制度”，除审稿专家要求具名外，对审稿专家的信息保密。
7)与作者、组织等存在竞争、合作或其他关联利益关系时，主动回避处理该稿件。
In order to further to enhance the professional ethics of authors, reviewers and editors, and improve the level of journal publishing, the Editorial Department of Acta Palaeontologica Sinica has combined with the actual situation of journal publishing to develop the publishing ethics of Acta Palaeontology Sinica.
1.Author's publishing ethics
1) The manuscript cannot be submitted to multiple journals at the same time, and the published manuscript cannot be published repeatedly.
2) The authors should ensure that the manuscript is original, free from plagiarism, plagiarism, data forgery, falsify and other academic misconduct, and that the content of the manuscript contains no confidential information.
3) The authors should ensure that the content of the manuscript is scientific and accurate, and the author is self-responsible.
4) All the signed authors must meet the requirements of the journal on the qualifications of authors, and the authors cannot be added or subtracted at will.
5) The authors should objectively evaluate the research results of others, and correctly quote from the manuscript.
6) The funding information related to the research shall be written in the manuscript, and other funding information unrelated to the research shall not be written in the manuscript.
7) The authors should respect the opinions of reviewers. If authors have any objection, they can appeal to the editorial department.
2.Publishing ethics of reviewers
1) The reviewers should timely review the manuscript and give specific comments on the review. If the review cannot be completed on time for some reason, the editorial department should be informed timely.
2) The evaluation of the manuscript should be objective and accurate, and there should be no offensive, belittling or personal attacks.
3) The reviewers should respect the author's research results, keep the contents of the manuscript confidential, and do not use the author's research results illegally.
4) In case of competition, cooperation or other related interest relationships with the author or the organization, the reviewer should actively avoid reviewing the manuscript.
3.Publishing ethics of editors
1) Editors should timely register, submit, edit and publish manuscripts to ensure fair treatment of each manuscript.
2) Editors should pay attention to publishing standards for the editing and publishing process.
3) Editors should respect the author's research results, keep the contents of the manuscript confidential, and do not use the author's research results illegally, before official publication.
4) Editors should respect the opinions of reviewers. If the author has any objection, the author is allowed to appeal.
5) Academic debate is encouraged and a hundred schools of thought contend.
6) Editors should adopt the "anonymous review system" to keep confidential the information about reviewers, except for the reviewer who asked to be named.
7) In case of competition, cooperation or other related interest relationships with the author or the organization, editors should actively avoid dealing with the manuscript.
《古生物学报》编辑部
Editorial Department of Acta Palaeontologica Sinica
2021.11.25
