A strange fossil described and illustrated in the present paper was collected by the writer in 1978 from the Huangshandong Member of the Lower Cambrian Tongying Formation in western Hubei. The material was preserved in greyish brown phosphoritic dolomites in association with elements of the Yangtze Micromolluscan Fauna, such as Tchangsichiton notabilus Yu and Sinuconus clypeus, Yu of Class Polyplacophora; Yangtzemerisma rarum Yu and Y.? cancellatum Yu of Class Merismoconchia; Yangtzeconus priscus Yu, Huangshandongoconus pileus Yu, Obtusoconus paucicostatus Yu, O. rostriptutea (Qian) and Spatuloconus rudis Yu of Class Monoplacophora; Bemella simplex Yu, Latouchlla of. memmorabilis Missarzhevsky, L. sanxiaesis Yu and L. lauta Yu of Class uncertain; Archaeospira ornata Yu, A. imbricata Yu and Cambrospira sinensis Yu of Class Gastropoda; Heraultipegma yunnanense He et Yang of Class Rostroconcbia: hyolithids and some other uncertain skeletal fossils. Although the systematic position of this peculiar fossil is unknown at present, it is inferred that this genus may be one of the typical primitive animal groups based on the characters of the shell and the spe cial spines. The shell is bilaterally symmetrical, elliptical in apical view; the dorsal side is roundly convex with three different forms of dorsal spines and several pairs of marginal spines on the anterior margin. Judged from the general morphological characters of the bilaterally symmetrical shell, these lower animals, generally speaking, have adapted themselves readily to different circumstances, and reduced resistance to any directional movement necessary for varied physiological activities. As to the function of the shell’s characteristics, the narrowly rounded side may serve as the anterior. Such a model of the body helps these animals go on with their benthonic creeping or swimming life. On the other hand, the dorsal spines are different from each other in shape, size, mode of arrangement and in number; especially, the end of the hook-shaped spines is generally curved outward, while the geniculate spines are oblique outward, and curved posteriorly all of a sudden. These structures of mechanism also provide us with the evidence that the narrowly rounded side serves as the anterior, while the opposite end as the posterior.It is of particular interest that this genus is somewhat similar to Phylum Mollusca, especially to the tryblidiids of Class Monoplacophora, in some morphological characters, such as: 1) the bilateral symmetry of the shell, 2) the outline elliptical in apical view and cap shaped in lateral view and 3) the dorsal side generally roundly convex. After careful study, it has been found that since this genus is strikingly different from monoplacopharans, may be it belongs to another interesting group of skeletal fossils. The reasons for this are: 1) in the former, there are many pairs of marginal spines on the anterior margin, while in monoplacophorans, no marginal spines can be seen; and 2) in this genus, the sculptures are different from each other in different areas, not only in shape and number, but also in the mode of arrangement, whereas in monoplacophorans, they are identical with each other in the same type and shape. Judged from the different forms of dorsal sculptures, this genus is comparatively similar to such uncertain shelly fossils as Lepidites Zhong, 1977 emend. Yu, 1987 and Xiadongoconus Yu, 1979 from the same horizon in the Yangtze Region of China, but differs from the latter two genera in the presence of marginal spines on the anterior margin. In addition, this new genus also differs from brachiopods and other skeletal fossils in the peculiar type of the shell. According to the above comparison, this genus is entirely different from all the classes of Phylum Mollusca, possibly representing another interesting group of skeletal fossils. It is impossible to determine the exact taxonomic position of this genus until more materials are available.